Overview of the Peer Review Process

The Journal of Sports Science Academy (JOSSA) adheres to a double-blind peer review system to ensure impartial and transparent evaluation of submitted manuscripts. Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their work.

1. Scientific Evaluation

The originality, scientific contribution, and methodological consistency of the manuscript should be thoroughly analyzed.

2. Constructive Feedback

Reviewers are expected to provide concrete and detailed suggestions to improve the manuscript.

3. Time Management

Reviewers should complete the review process within the specified time frame.

4. Ethical Compliance

The manuscript's adherence to ethical standards should be questioned, and any violations should be reported to the editorial board.